Skip to main content

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today


I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine.


The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma.


Initial setup


Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later.

To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy. 

A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division.

House rules aside, is this any good? Yes in short. The main trick here is the morale rules. When you take fire damage from arty or neighbouring infantry if their attack result exceeds your units morale you disrupt and retreat. Quite simple but it works really well. Mostly allied units with high morale are very difficult to budge with cannonades where as low morale units can run up and then back down the hill very quickly. It gives the game a good Crimea feel which was characterised by units breaking under fire or slogging through hails of bullets. 

Russian assault on French right stuck at first redoubt.



Strategically the Tchernaya River scenario has some good options. The French defenders have less to do early as they start in a really great position. The Russians do however have a few advantages; numbers, better melee, better artillery. If they just frontal assault they will likely get creamed, but they can work the ground on both flanks and test the French resolve. 

If have had a good year with magazine games this year, which is unusual. This is another winner.


Comments

  1. Interesting you made some additions for friction to the rules. Did you play solo? Would these have been necessary for face to face play still?

    Still need to learn more about Crimea as it is a whole in my 19th C knowledge.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. Even opposed i think Igo-Ugo all units perform exactly as ordered can feel a bit dated. Sometimes I don't mind as every rule slows down the game and adds more effort. If i were a publisher looking to put this back in print I would want to add some sort of C&C, whether a simple die roll or an activation system such as chit pull or impulse.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we