Skip to main content

A Netrunner Cube Draft; A recipe


4 netrunner starter sets (randomly generated using a program called netseal;

4 proteus boosters (also generated using netseal)

A ton of netrunner cards with which to assemble the generated sets from.

Android Netrunner now dominates the 'hotness' column on, and seems like its going to be a permanent fixture. I have about 800 netrunner cards, mostly acquired in one trade a couple of years ago for a copy of Core Worlds. The question in my mind for a while has been, should I flog off the whole set and buy into the new version? I prefer the early 90s campy cgi art and I'm tight fisted so I figured I'd try and breath some life into my cards by building a cube.

What is a cube? For the uninformed, in collectable card games (Magic the Gathering) you can play what is called a draft. This is when you all buy a bunch of sealed booster decks, open them, and then pass them around in a circle. Each player takes a card from each set that is passed to them and then passes it on. In this way you build a deck to play the game with. This is called a sealed draft. A cube draft is when you create a bunch of fake randomly generated booster decks from cards you already own and then do a draft. I think its called a cube because when you lay the cards out it often forms a square.


I used netseal to randomly generate 4 starter decks, that is 60 runner and 60 corp cards with no replicates. Each starter deck was originally designed to be fairly balanced in terms of ice cards, ice breakers, resource cards, traps, etc. They work as functional decks to play the game straight out the box. I then generated 4 boosters. I don't own every netrunner card, so where i was missing a card from the generated set I would either put in a close equivalent, or throw in an extra resource or engine card (by engine card i mean a card that allows you to search your deck or draw more cards).

To create a legal / working netrunner deck each faction needs certain cards. The corporation for instance needs to have a certain number of agenda cards, the runner needs at least one of each type of ice breaker and ideally a baselink card or two. In old netrunner these cards are classed as vitals. All of the other cards are classed by rarity, being a collectable card game. To make the draft work for the corp each player took all of the vitals out of the starter deck. So they each had about 10 agenda cards. These would not be drafted. You had to build your deck around these cards. For the runner each player took all of the ice breaker cards and all of the baselink cards out of their deck and were allowed to keep one of each type of ice breaker and two baselink cards. Everything else was shuffled and drafted in two drafts, the first draft for the corp cards, the second for the runner.

It took about 2 hours, which is very long for a draft. After the draft each player cut down the cards they had drafted (typically about 60-70 cards) down to around 45-50 card deck. In future I might just run two proteus boosters rather than 4 to speed things up a little and cut down the surplus cards.

Since then I've played 6 games with the decks I created, 3 as each faction. I was surprised how well this worked. It is not as smooth as a magic draft but it does work. My decks work to their strategic design, and my opponents decks varying degrees do function. The cube does seem to have been a bit short on runner resource cards still. I knew going in that runner resources can be worth their weight in gold, so I drafted quite a few of them, but certainly some of my opponents struggle to get their decks monetized. I might tweak this for future drafts.

My corp deck works about as well as one of my constructed ones. I built it around the idea of being able to res my agendas as quickly as possible, so I drafted plenty of resource cards and any cards that allow me to drop a lot of bits onto my agendas quickly. The deck is a little short on cheap ice, but never the less it is still unbeaten.

I've seen a few threads around looking at Android drafts. I imagine it would be harder than old netrunner as Fantasy Flight games added the faction system but people seem to think it is workable. Personally I find drafting far more interesting than pure constructed decks, and would recommend giving it a go.


Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Won by the Sword

Won by the Sword went down like Fat Man over Nagasaki on most wargame forums when released by GMT back in 2014. Lots of misprints on the components and errors in the rules gave it a bad rep to such an extent that GMT decided to bail it out with a patch. James and I have played a couple of games reworked version, it still rides like a bike with two missing gears but its probably the most innovative and insightful design to hit the scene in the past 10 years.

The rules; they work fine for the most part, James is clearer on the gaps than me, he reads them, I'm the opponent. What I will say is that they work if you can put the daddy pants on and make common sense decisions to fill any minor gaps.

Forage; Some games are about movement, some about concentration of fire, some moral, others unit composition, some bluff or even supply routes. Won by the Sword is about burning peoples villages and taking all their food, mostly just to stop your opponent doing it. This is the 30 years war, a…

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them.

Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Either way the players of both sides…

Quick Looks: Next War Taiwan

If there is a series for hex and counter hipsters at the moment it is Next War games by Mitch Land and Gene Billingsley. Kev Sharp's been blogging it 1, 3MA have been talking about it 2, these drunken reprobates have been playing it 3, two of my friends have picked up Next War India Pakistan 4, one of whom as his first hex and counter game. When I first saw the GMT Next War series with Next War Korea a few years back, I passed on it because it was pricey and I thought future wars were boring. I thought these things because I was a fool. I'm not entirely sure why the series has become popular, as speculative future wars seems like a hard sell but the continued releases (now three soon four) and the quality of the product seem to have carried it into the wargamer consciousness if not the popular.

Next War Taiwan depicts an invasion of Taiwan by mainland China sometime in the near future. I say sometime because the game has no fluff text paragraphs, opting instead to insert a few…