Skip to main content

A weekend of Wargaming Part 3: Plan Orange: The Pacific 1930-1935 Review

I’ve played a fair amount of Empire of the Sun over the past 5 years and now there are two magazine games based on the same system; South Pacific which is effectively a trimmed down version of the 1943 (or is it 42) scenario from the original game, and Plan Orange, a variant that takes a pacific war in the 1930s that was war gamed and considered by both sides but never took place.



I’m not going to discuss many of the games mechanics. Empire of the Sun is a very complex game and it is also rather unique. The core conceit is that you play cards from your hand to launch operations. An operation would be something like the battle of the Coral Sea, or the invasion of Guam. Based on the resources your cards give you, you would send out a fleet, your opponent may detect your move, either by die roll or card play) and counter with their own fleet. A battle or more may result perhaps followed by an amphibious landing. It’s a concise way for Mark Herman (the designer) to get you to juggle intel, supply, and staff team politics. The system does have command and control, on board supply and a lot of the usual effects found in heavy hex and counter games.

KAGIUN!


A benefit of fighting a what if war is that there is no script to follow or break from. There’s a giddy expectation looking over beautifully rendered pacific and determining how you are going to conduct this war. And this is a game that requires planning several turns ahead. The US must work out pretty early how many cards they want to burn mobilising their fleet from the strategic map, and how many axis they want to advance down. The Japanese, once they have taken the Philippines (the games main objective) must weigh up whether they are going to fight the US in the deep Pacific, or exploit the shorter lines of communication near the home islands. Both are viable.



Plan Orange, like Empire of the Sun, is a game that in equal measure can make you feel really clever or really stupid. Clever, when you put together a multi card plan and an overall game strategy and it blossoms as the cherry tree. You can also very easily mess up, put your fleet in slightly the wrong place, waste a key card or miss balance your army dispositions and find yourself completely open.

I opted for a more defensive strategy as the IJN which resulted in a series of attritional fleet engagements


This is not an easy game to parse tactically, though it is easier than its parent game. There are fewer pieces, air forces aren’t going to cut your supplies much and the cards are less powerful. You will however have to contend with a less mobile fleet than one has in Empire. Plan Orange is its own game, it’s a more focused and short game than Empire of the Sun and in some respects I prefer it because it lets me dial in on a few tough decisions and work through their consequences.




This is the best magazine game I have played with its sister game South Pacific probably a close second. Most magazine games that I have played have something interesting about them but feel undercooked. Plan Orange works in part because Mark Herman has taken one his greatest designs and repackaged it near perfectly. There is some set up errata and rules are complex but it is worth it.

Comments

  1. Given I fall into the 'miss- placing the fleet' and wasting cards category I'll look forward to my next game of it now I've got a better handle on the rules.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei