Skip to main content

A weekend of Wargaming Part 4: 1:1200 Pre-Dreadnaught Naval, A Quick Look

I don’t know what the rule set we have used is called but it’s based around Tsushima, so im going to refer to it as that (Pete may comment with more info). In both games I’ve played the Russian Baltic Fleet, Pete the IJN combined fleet.

Tsushima is a game of two very distinct halves. In the first you move around paper markers trying to out bluff and out manoeuvre each other to cross your opponents T and get your destroyers in close. This is by far the most nail biting time I have had with miniatures.


Paper counters - three real, one decoy remain


Once your two bluff counters have been seen through and your others revealed you swap them out for metal ships (1:1200) and your fleet is on the table. The first half is the initial jockeying for position and the first pass. The second half is the following confusion and then perhaps a second or more passes. The first pass is very much a calculated icy affair of trying to secure the best fire angle for your fleet. After this the game sort of takes a life of its own as your formations break up, ships blow up and strategy starts to go out the window.

I have already described the mechanics in brief in a previous post; http://lestradesgame.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/metal-ships.html.

Firing is a very random affair, one shot could hit a hull, score a critical hit and down your opponents lead battleship. Or you could blast away for three turns and barely make a scratch. The strategy in this game is about maximising your odds of getting either a critical hit, or scoring hits with your biggest calibre guns.  You achieve this by crossing your opponents T, getting your fore, aft and flank guns on to their lead ship and limiting them to their fore deck gunnery or by getting into first port and then starboard (or vice versa) torpedo range to off load your tubes.

In this weekend’s game Pete out scouted me early and forced me into a compromise. One on hand by deploying my battleships second I was able to cross his T, but I had to sacrifice my destroyers to do it. I didn’t win two very tense initiative rolls and he duly sunk my destroyers. My battleships and cruisers did enjoy a superior volume of fire over the first two turns but it did not yield any critical hits or significant damage. Once our lines were parallel the exchange was more or less a draw, he sunk my old battleship and two cruisers out right, and I put his cruisers out of action. I did score a critical hitting his flag ship bridge but the Pete S ‘Togo’ lucked out and sailed away with only scars.   
 
Terrible picture, but my phones battery died. One destroyer sunk (red cone) the other two will soon follow, but my battleships are well positioned.

Having destroyers, Battleships and Cruisers each with their own roles gives this game perhaps a little more strategic depth than Fivecore. You can deploy on one line, or several echelons, you can hold your destroyers back and wait to your opponents secondary gunnery has been reduced in combat, or you can try and gain the advantage early with a torpedo rush. These are the clear cut but difficult decision points that I look for in strategy games. 

Comments

  1. Yup the rules are just called 'Tsushima'. BTW- I've found corrected play aids that tell you what advantage evasive maneuvering gives you.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete
  2. addendum to this article, the scale of these ships was 1:2500 not 1:1200, shows how much I know about minis.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is.

Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'.



But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just.


Red Star / White Eagle is a GDW 1979 Hex and Counter wargame covering the 1920 Russo - Polish war. Everything …

Quick Play Thru: Washington's Crossing

Being a man who likes diversity I bought / pre-ordered 4 games for Christmas about dudes in flashy coats with muskets marching around road networks. I’ve already Quick looked at Nappys Nemesis 1813, Metz is yet to be released from P500, Autumn of Glory is on the shelf, so this weekend I have played Washington’s Crossing.




The Patriot opening more or less followed the script. Washington moved with his stack, crossed the Delaware with decent movement and ferry rolls and come morning was sat just outside Trenton next to Rall’s Hessian garrison. The American gets a rather scripted +5 to surprise rolls when attacking Trenton, plus it being dawn and a prepared attack gave Washington very favourable odds but the roll was terrible and Rall escaped with only 25% losses and a retreat.
Further south Greene collected a few detachments of militia and drove the other Hessian garrisons north.



The Hessians forced marched out wide forcing Washington to either hunt them down for a few extra vps, or look el…

Quick Looks: The Pacific War: From Pearl Harbour to the Philippines

Imported games have the allure of being foreign and expensive, they also often come with the glamorous trappings of bad rules translation. Pacific War is all of these things but first the good;
It’s short. I’m not being factious here, generally Pacific Theatre war games are long and complicated, which is fine but it leaves the shallow end of the dream pool rather empty. The Pacific War clocks in around 2-3 hours and feels engrossing for this life span.
You’ve got a point to point map, pretty and functional but no pageant winner, a deck of cards, and a load of counters representing ships that come in on a historical reinforcement schedule. Each year long turn you get a variable number of cards. Players take action rounds discarding a card to win the privilege of doing something and then either play an event card, or move some ships, or resupply some ships (so they can move again). Once out of cards they roll off for priority in taking more actions but if they roll doubles the year ends.