Skip to main content

Quick Looks: SCS Autumn for Barbarossa


Standard Combat Series (SCS) by MMP should probably be known as Vanilla Combat Series since in today’s wargame market its throwback simple jack of all trades system. There is no command and control system, no supply, no moral, just move and attack, and then move again if your units have wheels.




Other than being fairly simple the system has a reputation for high movement rates and a really bloody CRT, both are evident in Autumn for Barbarossa. A tank division could almost move right across the length of the half sheet map and back in turn, assuming it moved again in the exploitation phase.





In most WW2 wargames you want to outnumber the defending forces by 3:1 to get good odds on your attack role. This is apparently based on lots of research and has become ubiquitous in game CRTs. Unlike A Victory Lost, or a Kevin Zucker game Autumn for Barbarrossa’s CRT kills units on any result. For the Ruski 1:1 ratio is worth a punt given your replacement rates.




That’s the system, not much there but it knows what it is. SCS is for simple panzer pushing. Swinging your best units around the map jabbing your opponent in the ribs and pushing your luck with the CRT. Its quick playing and ultra violent, on the east front this is quite evocative. 



Smolensk 41 has an argument for being the pivotal battle of WW2. The Nazi’s best change of KO’ing Russia was probably in 41 and this was when they stalled out. The two sides start off lined up Dvina Dnepr rivers with the Germans having the superior troop quality in their panzer regiments. Its quite easy to break out and run riot across central Russia, but then Hitler will withdraw 90% of their mechanised forces halfway through the game and the Russian reinforcements pour in. Clinging on to those vp towns is actually quite difficult, as is assaulting Smolensk itself. 



I didn’t expect to like Autumn for Barbarossa as much as I did. I find the lack of serious command and control or supply rules a bit disappointing but this game makes up for it with a good map situation. A good road network with choke points and plenty of marshes hexes makes this a surprisingly good map to joust tanks over. Equally the steady flow of Russian reinforcements forces the German player to be sensible with their forces, if they exploit the movement and overstretch they will get caught in pockets and liquidated. 

Once the German panzers were withdrawn a Russian counter attack was easy


On balance I slightly prefer A Victory Lost having played that title immediately before this. SCS has a better CRT and feels less gamey, but the chit pull and more restrictive terrain effects chart give AVL a little more colour. MMP released Autumn for Barbarossa as a trimmed down version of their forth coming OCS Smolensk. I'm undecided at this point as to whether I need another Smolensk game though.


Labels:

Comments

  1. Pete.31 March 2018 at 04:28

    Fast and bloody East Front action what's not to love? Sign me up.

    'We Drive east...'

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simon Lestrade31 March 2018 at 06:41

      there is definitely a soviet beast in this one.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mutant Future RPG, and thoughts on retroclones

I've started GMing a campaign using Mutant Future by Goblinoid games. My campaigns usually only last 2-6 sessions and we are now two sessions in. I've seen many of the games mechanics in action and feel comfortable committing my thoughts on the game to the screen. I say I am using Mutant Future rather than running or playing it, because like many older school RPGs experiences and interpretations of the rules of the game will vary widely from group to group. Equally interpretations of the game setting can vary a lot. I'm not really that into the Fallout, Mad Max, dudes with sharp bits of metal and tentacles protruding from their bodies type of post destruction world. I either like the very grungy A Roadside Picnic, Stalker, or Metro 2033 type world with grimy guys climbing around in rain coats and cheap anti radiation suits with sawn off shotties, or a more low fantasy approach like Nausicaa Valley of the Wind (A great Manga/Anime). For this game I decided to set it in a m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by...
2 comments
Read more

Jena Campaign - Debrief - Lessons learned.

On the last Saturday of this past June I enjoyed one of the best learning experiences I have had in wargaming to put a positive spin on it. The day did not start well in character as General von Ruchel I arrived to the field 3 hours late having boarded the wrong train. When I arrived I discovered that my colleagues had spread our forces in a long thin line between the Fulda gap and Gera with no reserve. Control's game map The Jena campaign megagame, designed by Rupert Clamp was devised as a double blind map game. Each side of 10-15 players wrote orders for each division ordering it about a large map of central Germany. When battle was joined a divisional commander collected his regimental level counters and played a simple face to face tactical game. A step up the chain of command it was the army commanders (generals) role to devise the overall strategy for then the divisional/corps commanders and their chiefs of staff teams to implement. Or if you were on the Pruss...
7 comments
Read more