Skip to main content

Man-O-War - 1990s Games Workshop, 2024 Review

 

I’ve not successfully blogged in a while, mostly due to excessive miniature painting. I will post some of the years progress in a post soon.

 

Generally speaking I have not had much luck with 3d prints. Some have had poor detail, others wrong scale, others rather fragile. The only 3d prints I’ve bought that have been great was my Man-O-War fleet. It cost me £30 off Ebay for a 1000pt dark elf fleet and it’s been a blast to play with.


The perfidious Brets approach my glorious dragon fleet

 

Man-O-War was released by GW in the 1990s, it was one of their shorter run base game plus a few expansions then done products and it is very much a game of its time. Its best and worst features are typical of 80s and 90s games.

 

Avast ye surly dogs!

 

Broad brush Man-O-War is a very traditional naval game. Your fleet will have 5-10 ships in a typical game, you have a basic system for determining wind direction, which influences sail movement. Your ships have turning arcs, little cards for tracking damage to different parts of the ship, status effects.  I move a ship, you move a ship, etc. If you have played naval games this kind of thing is pretty familiar.

 

 

So what makes it good? With the possible exception of the three best fleets; Empire, Bretonnians and High Elves, the fleet/faction designs are nuts. The dark elves can go crazy or refuse to fight when they roll 1s, but swing for the fences on 6s, and their black arc can literally just push its way through the opposing fleet, the Chaos Dwarves have hilariously unbalanced destructive spells but have to keep casting or their wizard may implode, they also have a grad missile launcher, the orks have a massive hammer on one of their ships, the dwarves get a submarine, the skaven can blow away their opponents crews with their bell. 

 

The Chaos Dwarves approacheth
            

Man-O-War is rich in imagination, it shows you a lot of that unbridled enthusiasm and daring that made GW great. The resulting games can be super fun with tense comedic moments and daring gambits as you run your fleet through a bottle neck or pincer your opponent. It has given me some of the best gaming moments of 2024 and my little fleet is probably the best investment of year.

 

 

So what's the rub? A few things. First the game is not balanced. I don’t believe game balance is essential, and I am not sure this matters that much here, but it is noticeable. The dull points efficient move fast and shoot a lot factions, Brets, Empire, High Elves do just seem quite a bit better than the other fleets I have seen. They won’t win every game, but they probably should always be favourites. The bigger issue is probably that the more interesting, and silly fleets incentive risk taking and fun play, the move and shoot type fleets incentivise the opposite. 


 


Second, the game is not cheap. A friend offered me £100 for a complete original box of bits. I declined, not because this is terrible value, but it’s more than I would want to pay. In the 1990s GW loved terrible card decks and lots of tokens. This game uses cards for a magic system and fleet bonus upgrades. Both of these systems work ok, but a more modern game would probably ditch the card deck and deliver the same content at a much lower cost and with a lot less mechanical faff for something which is very random and results in nothing interesting twice as often as something hilarious. The ship cards and heaps of status markers can easily be substituted with a pen and redesigned print out. You could DIY a set, but probably there are better ways to spend your time.

 

Tis an ambush!

Thirdly, the experience is very uneven in a multitude of ways. It can over stay its welcome, running over 3 hours (in some games), the scenarios are rather hit and miss, you could drive a bus through some of the rules gaps and will have to resolve issues with your opponent. In short this is definitely not a game for competitive types or those short on time. To get the best out of Man-O-War you need two+ players who say “it would be really funny if”. This is kind of the secret sauce many 1990s GW games and it’s why they are great but also terrible.

 

I'd quite like to see modern GW take another crack at the naval game. They tried with Dreadfleet (which I liked) but it tanked hard, so perhaps they have been put off the genre. Whilst I have mixed views on the Age of Sigmar aesthetic I think it would suite a naval game really well, the steam punk and high fantasy could really work and their modern boardgame design sensibilities could deliver something a lot slicker. It likely wouldn't have the charm and whimsey of the original but it could still be worth seeing. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous13 September 2024 at 13:42

    Looks like you've been having fun with it. Like you say games from that era are flawed but enjoyable.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division
2 comments
Read more

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we
2 comments
Read more

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei
3 comments
Read more