Skip to main content

A weekend of Wargaming Part 1: Fivecore Review

I shuffled in to 2018 with a weekend of Wargaming at my friend Pete’s. Here follows a look at four of the games we played, two miniature, two board.

Five Core Brigade Commander is essentially the RTS video game Wargame Airland Battle in table top form. Our setting is cold war gone warm central Deutschland 1980s. In this weekend’s game I had a Soviet Armoured regiment mostly composed of T72s with some infantry and specialist support, and crucially two hind attack helicopters. The game is structured around ‘bases’ a square a few cm wide holding some 6mm minis that represents a company, either armoured, mech or foot. You get perhaps 12 of these with a few platoon sized assets supporting them. Each asset, e.g. Anti-air manpads or engineers either confers a special ability to its attached company or operates as an orbital unit that is thrown out from its parent to do something useful. For instance recon units can be thrown out to spot enemy in cover.

T72s line up against BOARs Chieftans. Bill scouted my force in the woods and hammered it with arty.


You also get some cards you can play that allow you to call in off map artillery (with great effect) and deploy spec ops etc. A turn comprises of an initiative roll and turn type determination followed by igougo in which you get an activation for every 3 bases you have*. Turn type has as similar effect to a chit pull system in a board war game in so far as it stops you doing what you planned to do periodically. You roll a die and you might get a normal turn, or you might get a scurry turn, move only no shooting, or a fire fight shoot only no move. Hopefully you get a normal turn then you move your bases and shoot.
*I’m simplifying a bit here.
Hinds move in to avoid a disaster, dead eye Bill seems to roll only hits


Moving works the way it works in every minis game I’ve played. Terrain is quite simple, you have wood and urban areas that basically just block line of sight, allow you to hide, and slow you down. A look up table tells you what can shoot what, and how many blue (shock) and red (kill) dice you can throw. Only 1s and 6s do something, 6s wiping stuff out, and 1s simply stunning units. 

A late charge up the right flank seemed like an ace move. Bill countered with some quickly redeployed manpads.



I usually try to keep my reviews low on mechanics descriptions and high on bluster but minis games are a more alien world for me. Fivecore manages the double feat of being simple enough to play with a concussion but rewarding smart play with your recon assets, and area denial tactics. There isn’t a vast amount of differentiation between the different factions (I’ve played games with Soviet, BOAR and US) but different regiment types, armour, mech, airborne would all be quite asymmetric in play. The use of one use off map artillery and spec ops cards also generate some pivoting movements. It looks good (if you’ve got Pete and Bill’s minis) and there is no rules referencing but it still feels convincing. I found that my helos could be used in a similar way to how I use them in the Wargame video game series, as a highly mobile reserve that can be used to both plug a gap and draw the enemy forward. 

Comments

  1. Blimey- that was quick. I'll keep you posted for the multiplayer game later this year.

    Cheers,

    Pete.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quick Looks: Cimean War Battles - Tchernaya River

 A quick one today I traded off Across the Narva by Revolution Games (should post something on this) for an oldish (2000) copy of an S&T magazine. The mag came with two battles reprinted from the 1978 Quad game on the Crimean War. The full Quad also contained Inkerman and Balaklava, this magazine version just has Tchernaya River and Alma. Initial setup Early SPI games (and actually GDW and AH come to think of it) of the 70s tend to have lots of rules you already know. I go, U go, movement, fire, melee, rally, and most of the rules are standard. Command and control rules and friction of war arrived a lot later. To couter this I have added a simple house rule. For each division (units are brigates and regiments, about 2-8 per division) roll. On a 1 in 6 movement is halved unless the unit can charge, in which case it must charge the nearest enemy.  A simple easy to apply rule for generating those light brigade charges. You could also easily convert this to a chit pull game by division

Quick Looks; Red Star / White Eagle

I generally hate it when people describe designs or ideas in games as dated, because many of the most innovative games  are older than I am. Equally it implies there is something innately good about new designs, which I don't think there is. Dune is arguably the best multiplayer 'war' boardgame and the 70s basic DnD is in my view still the best RPG. I wasn't born until the late 80s and didn't discover these things to the mid 2000s so this isn't nostalgia doing my thinking, its just that some old ideas are better than new ones, despite our apparent 'progress'. Back when Roger B MacGowan did cool art house covers But having said all this Red Star / White Eagle is a dated game design. And this matters if you are looking at popping £70 on a new reprint of it from Compass Games. I am a wary cheapskate so I picked up a second hand copy with a trashed box of ebay for £20. It was worth it, but only just. Poles have just been creamed on the south we

Wilderness War is probably the best CDG (review)

One attribute of a good war game is that it opens up rather than narrows down the more you play it. Each time you play you see there is more strategic depth than you thought there was. When I first started playing Wilderness War, a card driven wargame design (CDG) on the French Indian War by Volko Runke, I thought it was simply a case of the British building a large kill stack and marching it up the Hudson and the French trying to get enough victory points (vps) from raiding to win before the inevitable. The outcome would likely be decided by card play and who got the reinforcement cards when they needed them. The game is afoot.  Four games later I have realised that this is not the case. Yes the British will sometimes win by marching a big army up the Hudson and sieging out Montreal, but a lot of the time things will play out quite differently. Maybe the French strike first, perhaps the British realise that going up the Hudson is going to be a slog try another route. Ei